SRI NATH PANDEY Vs. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition is directed against the order dated 1.9.1999 passed by the Prescribed Authority rejecting the application (44 -B) of the petitioner to dismiss the petition. Briefly, stated, the facts are that the respondent No. 2 filed an application under Section 21(1)(a) of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 against the petitioner for releasing the disputed property on the ground of bona fide need.

(2.) DURING the pendency of the case the petitioner filed an application for discovery of certain facts. The application was allowed.

(3.) I have heard Sri T.N. Govil, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Yashrath, learned Counsel for the respondent.