BINOD KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. K. Agarwal, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THIS revision has been filed against an order granting maintenance to the op posite parties. The impugned order was passed on 30-9-1998 by the Family Court, Kanpur Nagar.

(3.) UNDER these circumstances, I am of the opinion that the matter deserves to be remanded back to the Court below for reconsideration of the validity of these documents. As passing remark, it will be pertinent to mention that the Family Court may initiate reconciliation proceeding between the warring parties. The order does not show any such attempt having been made by him. It is always to the benefit of the life of the family and social justice requires such an effort to be made by Courts.