MAHESH PRASAD NIGAM Vs. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A. K. Yog, J. This Petition has been filed by the tenant challenging order dated May 25, 1999 whereby the Prescribed Authority, exercising its powers under Section 21 (l) (a), UP. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Evic tion) Act, 1972 (U. P. Act No XIII of 1972) (for short called the 'act') allowed landlord's application for issuing commis sion in order to obtain spot inspection report so as to enable it to ascertain the factual position.

(2.) THE tenant's objections against the said application have been rejected. By the impugned order the Prescribed Authority has appointed a commissioner requiring him to submit its report by July 20,1999. Certified copy of the said order was ob tained, as the record shows, on May 31, 1999. Writ petition has not been filed promptly. THE Writ Petition itself is dated 2nd June, 1999 and it was got reported on 7th July, 1999. It has been filed on I9th July, 1999 and placed before this Court today (20th July, 1999) i. e. on the date fixed by the Prescribed Authority for submis sion of commissioner's report. THE petitioner, who is tenant, is resorting to delaying tactics.

(3.) THE Writ Petition is devoid of merits and dismissed summarily at admis sion stage.