ISHTIAQ AHMAD Vs. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY ETAWAH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner is tenant of the shop. Respondent No. 2, Waqf Alal Aulad Ramzan Khan is the owner and landlord. Respondent No. 3, Shamsuddin is the Mutawalli.

(2.) RESPONDENTS no. 2 and 3 filed an application for release of the shop under section 21(1) (a) of U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972 setting up the bonafide need of the respondent no. 3.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submitted that this amendment application changes the nature of the case inasmuch as an entirely different and contradictory need has been set up. I do not agree with the contention.