LAWS(ALL)-1979-4-51

BABBAN MANI TEWARI Vs. RAM BARANS

Decided On April 18, 1979
Babban Mani Tewari Appellant
V/S
Ram Barans Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a Plaintiffs' application in revision directed against the judgment and decrees passed by the courts below dismissing the Plaintiff -applicant's suit for recovery of certain sum of money said to have been advanced to the Defendant -opposite party on the basis of promissory note. The suit was filed on 20 -1 -1976. While the suit was pending before the trial court, the U.P. Regulation of Money Lending Act, 1976 came into force. The Act received the assent of the President on 17 -7 -1976 and was published in the U.P. Gazette on 20 -7 -1976. After the coming into force of this Act, the Defendant -opposite party raised a plea that the Plaintiff -applicant's suit was barred by the provisions of the aforesaid Act. An issue was struck on the plea raised by the Defendant -opposite -party as issue No. 3 which was to the effect, whether the suit of the Plaintiff was barred by Sections 18 and 26 of U.P. Act No. 29 of 1976. The trial court held that the provisions of Sections 18 and 26 of the aforesaid Act barred the suit inasmuch as the Plaintiff -applicant had not got himself registered as a money lender within three months of the commencement of the Act. On this finding, the trial court dismissed the Plaintiff -applicant's suit.

(2.) AGGRIEVED , the Plaintiff filed an appeal. The appellate court has also held that the suit was barred by Sections 18 and 26 of the aforesaid Act. The lower appellate court has observed that inasmuch as the Plaintiff had not furnished the necessary information to the Registrar about the present loan, the suit was incompetent in law. The lower appellate court has dismissed the appeal of the Plaintiff -opposite -party (?) on this finding without going into the merits of the suit.

(3.) HAVING heard Learned Counsel for the parties, I am clearly of the view that the Plaintiff -applicant is entitled to succeed on the second point urged on his behalf. So far as the first point is concerned, I am in agreement with the view expressed by the court below. I shall take up these points in serial order.