RANG BAHADUR Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a reference made by a learned single Judge of this Court while hearing Criminal Revision No. 394 of 1979 (Rang Bahadur v. State ).

(2.) THE question referred has not been formulated by the learned Judge. On perusing the order of reference and the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge dated 8-12-1978 which gave rise to the revision application before this Court, we find that the question referred to us appears to be:

(3.) THE learned Sessions Judge observed: As to the non-observance of the provisions of Section 130 of the Act, this is a case in which the driver voluntarily appeared before the Court and as such it will have no application vide In Re: M. Maruthi, which pronouncement also considered the earlier Calcutta and Supreme Court pronouncements on the subject.