SATYA PRAKASH Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE applicant has been convicted under Section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and sentenced to 6 months' R. I. and a fine of Rs, 1000/ -. In default of payment of fine, he is to undergo 3 months' R. I. His conviction and sentence has been maintained in appeal by the Sessions Judge Moradabad, hence this revision,

(2.) A sample of Besan (gram flour) was purchased by the Food Inspector from the applicant on 21st Jan. 1976 at 10. 30 A. M. in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law. One of the sample phials in the possession of the Food Inspector was sent for analysis the report of the Public Analyst was as follows:

(3.) I have heard learned Counsel for the applicant and have also perused the impugned order. I do not find any illegality or peversity in the findings recorded concurrently by the courts below upholding the conviction of the applicant.