RAGHUBIR SARAN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I agree that this application should be dismissed. The full facts of the case are set out in the Orders of my learned brothers, Sapru and Bhargava J J , and I gene, rally agree with the reasons given by them.

(2.) The applicant was removed from practice by an Order of the Special Bench of three Judges in miscellaneous Case No. 243 of 1946 dated 20th December 1946. On 29th July 1947, the present application for re-instatement and permission to practise was made by the applicant. It purports to be an application under Section 12 (6), Bar Councils Act.

(3.) After an anxious consideration of the whole matter, I have reached the conclusion that the present application is thoroughly misconceived and has no merits and that it must be dismissed. Sapru, J.