FARHANA Vs. STATE OF U P AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The Criminal Misc. Recall/Restoration Application No. 52448 of 2016 dated 15.02.2016 has been filed by the applicant-revisionist with a prayer to recall the order dated 09.02.2016 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court, whereby the present revision has been dismissed on merits. The order dated 09.02.2016 is reproduced herein below:-.

(2.) The substratum of submissions advance by the learned counsel for the applicant-revisionist is that on 09.02.2016, he was busy in Court No. 55 and when he reached Court No.9, he came to know that in Court No. 9, transferred cases of Court No. 43 are being taken up and cases of Court No. 9 have been transferred to Court No. 28 and thereupon he reached Court No. 28 and got an information that the criminal revision, which was listed at serial No. 8, has been dismissed and, therefore this recall application has been moved. On the strength of aforesaid fact, last plank of submission is that order dated 09.02.2016 is liable to be recalled.

(3.) Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate has vehemently opposed by contending that the criminal revision has been dismissed on merits, therefore, the order dated 09.02.2016 is not liable to be recalled.