LAWS(ALL)-2019-7-510

RAMESH CHANDRA CHAUBEY Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Decided On July 16, 2019
Ramesh Chandra Chaubey Appellant
V/S
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri L.P. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and to Sri Kuldeep Pati Tripathi, learned Additional Advocate General for the State-respondents and Sri Ashok Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent-Commission.

(2.) Brief fact of the case is that 49 vacancies were requisitioned to the Commission for initiation of selection proceeding on the post of Sub Registrar and Auditor Panchayat. In pursuance thereof, an advertisement was issued inviting applications from the eligible and qualified candidates in the year 2001. The petitioners having eligibility criteria as prescribed under the advertisement applied for the post of Sub Registrar as well as on the post of Auditor Panchayat.

(3.) A selection proceeding was conducted and result of the same was declared by reducing the vacancies from 49 to 10. In the said selection, the petitioners were selected on the post of Auditor Panchayat and joined the post under bonafide belief that the vacancies have been reduced on genuine grounds. One Anoop Kumar Singh filed Writ Petition No.1697 (SB) of 2010 (Anoop Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others), wherein after exchange of affidavits, this Court passed a judgment with the following direction: