NAMITA SHARMA Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Shri S.P. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri P.D. Tripathi, Advocate for District Basic Education Officer, Bareilly.

(2.) Present writ petition is preferred for mandamus commanding the respondents to appoint him on the post of Assistant Teacher alongwith all consequential benefits awarded to the similarly situated candidates, who have been appointed in pursuance of result of Special B.T.C.-2007. The request has also been made to issue direction to the respondents to pay her salary and also consider the seniority alongwith other similarly situated candidates appointed after declaration of the result of Special B.T.C. 2007.

(3.) It appears that earlier the petitioner had preferred Writ A No.3533 of 2009 (Namita Sharma vs. State of UP and others) assailing the validity of the order dated 29.12.2008, which was passed on the ground that the institution, from where the petitioner had undergone B.Ed Training, was not recognized. In the said writ petition, the counter affidavit was filed and it has been brought into the notice of the Court that the said degree was valid and the institution was recognized from the concerned University. Consequently, the aforesaid writ petition was allowed on 16.5.2013 with following observations:-