KISHAN LAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Re: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 39937 of 1997

(2.) Today learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of the aforesaid order has placed reliance on the order passed by me in First Appeal No. 539 of 1982 Risal Singh and others vs. Sate of U.P. and claimed that in that case there was a delay of thirteen years which was condoned by this Court and substitution application was allowed. He submits that under such circumstances the present applications are also liable to be allowed.

(3.) Sri Shivam Yadav, learned counsel for the NOIDA submitted that such huge delay cannot be condoned. He submits that cause shown is not sufficient.