RAKESH RAMAN Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri H.P. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

(2.) By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

(3.) The contention of Sri H.P. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner is that one departmental inquiry, which was initiated against the petitioner in the year 2011, has been finally concluded on 27.10.2017 as office memo to that effect has been issued by the Secretary of the Department, which is contained as Annexure No.6 to the writ petition.? On account of the aforesaid inquiry, the candidature of the petitioner was kept under sealed cover and since the said inquiry has been concluded wherein the petitioner has been exonerated, the sealed cover should be opened.