DEV DUTT SHARMA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shishir Jain, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 and Sri Amit Sharma, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 1.

(2.) The present writ petition has been filed for the following main reliefs:-

(3.) The brief facts, as borne out, from the writ petition, for the purposes of reliefs sought, are that the petitioner was appointed (not on regular basis) on the post of Assistant Account in U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam (in short "U.P.R.N.N.") on 01.01.1987. Prior to it, the petitioner worked in U.P. State Sugar Cooperative as Assistant Accountant. In U.P.R.N.N regular selection for appointment on the vacant post of Assistant Accountant was held. A select list was prepared on 18.11.1991. In the select list, the name of the petitioner finds place at serial No. 10. Some persons were appointed but the petitioner was ignored. Being a selected candidate he ought to have been given appointment but in arbitrary manner the appointed was not given to the petitioner. Thus, the petitioner approached this Court for reliefs sought.