RAKESH DEEPAK SHUKLA Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Revisionist has approached this Court under section 397 Cr.P.C, assailing the order dated 8.1.2013 passed by learned Trial court in the discharge application filed by the revisionist under section 339 Cr.P.C The revisionist further assailed the order dated 31.1.2013 (amended with permission of this Court vide order dated 16.4.2013) whereby the charges under section 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC have been framed against the Revisionist.

(2.) This Court has passed the following order on 29.4.2013.

(3.) The point for consideration in the present revision petition is that whether in the present case, the charge framed under section 406 against the revisionist has complied with the particulars as to time, place and person as prescribed in section 212 (2) Cr.P.C and in case said charge is bereft of such particulars, whether such error or omission is material so much as the accused has been misled by such error or omission which has occasioned a failure of justice as mentioned in section 215 Cr.P.C?