BALADIN Vs. D. D. C.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Order on Civil Misc. Amendment Application no.26 of 2019

(2.) This writ petition has been filed challenging an order dated 30.05.1984 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Prayagraj (then Allahabad) in Revision no.44 of 1981, allowing that Revision, filed by respondents nos.4, 5 & 6. The interest of respondent no.6 is now represented by respondent no.5. The Revisional Court while doing so, set aside an appellate order of the Settlement Officer of Consolidation dated 01.08.1981 passed in Appeal no.88/165/62 and Appeal no.95/168/177 of 1981, that had, in turn, affirmed an order of the Consolidation Officer dated 05.03.1980, granting mutation in favour of petitioners. The petitioners' application, thus, stands rejected by the impugned order dated 30.05.1984 made by the Deputy Director of Consolidation in Revision.

(3.) The proceedings giving rise to the impugned order commenced before the Consolidation Officer on an application for mutation made by the original writ petitioners, Baladin son of Shiv Badal and Vijai Bahadur son of Sitaram, seeking mutation of their rights over agricultural land, comprising Khasra nos.379 and 405, situate in Village Pasiapur, Pargana & Tehsil Soraon, District Prayagraj. The aforesaid mutation application was made under Section 12 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, and hereinafter referred to as the Act.