(1.) Heard Sri V.K. Agnihotri, learned counsel of revisionist and learned AGA for State of U.P.
(2.) This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed assailing judgment and order dated 17.01.2000 passed by learned VIIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Etawah, in Sessions Trial No. 266 of 1991, in Case Crime No. 76-A of 1989, under Sections 452 and 307 IPC, acquitting opposite parties- 2 to 4 from said offence. Being aggrieved, Informant preferred present revision.
(3.) Learned counsel for revisionist contended that Court below has not properly appreciated evidence in acquitting opposite party. He tried to take this Court to the judgment of Court below and made his endeavor to show that view taken by Court below in appreciating the evidence is not correct.