REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

DEEPAK SINGH Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

T.R. KATHA N. DARAMAN VS. TAMIL NADU WATER AND DRAINAGE BOARD [REFERRED TO]
A FULL BENCH OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT) ( MANJIT SINGH V. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS . [REFERRED TO]
PARVAIZ AHMAD PARRY V. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
SANDEEP KUMAR BAPNA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
MANGANESE ORE INDIA LIMITED VS. REGIONAL ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX JABALPUR [REFERRED TO]
WAMAN RAO HANMANTRAO CHANDRA SHEKAR VITHALRAO SHRI BABURAO ALIAS P B SAMANT VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. T SUNDARARAMAN [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD RIAZUL USMAN GANI VS. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE NAGPUR [REFERRED TO]
RAJPAL VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
JYOTI K K VS. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [REFERRED TO]
P M LATHA VS. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
YOGESH KUMAR VS. GOVERNMENT OF NTC DELHI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL VS. SIDHARTH SRIVASTAVA [REFERRED TO]
DILIP KUMAR GHOSH VS. CHAIRMAN [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HARYANA VS. ABDUL GAFFAR KHAN [REFERRED TO]
SHANKER RAJU VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRAKALA TRIVEDI VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
RASHMI REKHA THATOI VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
STATE IF UTTARAKHAND VS. DEEP CHANDRA TEWARI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. ANITA [REFERRED TO]
ZAHOOR AHMAD RATHER AND ORS ETC VS. SHEIKH IMTIYAZ AHMAD AND ORS ETC [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Questions arising and framed in the following three orders are referred to this Bench for its considerations: (i) order dated 29.11.2018 passed in Writ - A No. 24273 of 2018 (Deepak Singh And 9 others vs. State of U.P . and 8 others), (ii) order dated 12.1.2009 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 671 of 2009 ( Ajay Kumar Singh vs. State of U.P. and another ) and (iii) order dated 15.2.2019 passed in Special Appeal No. 09 of 2019 (Himan Singh vs. State of U.P. and 8 others).

(2.) In the backdrop of the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Parvaiz Ahmad Parry vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others , the learned Single Judge referred the matter to the present larger Bench framing the following questions:

(3.) The learned Single Judge disagreed with another judgement rendered by a Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 7012 (S/S) of 2001 ( Annup Ratan Awasthi vs. Public Service Commission, Allahabad and Ors .) wherein the learned Single Judge held that the degree holders were not eligible for the said post. The learned Single Judge while referring the matter to the larger Bench disagreed with the learned Single Judge judgement given in the case of Annup Ratan Awasthi for the following reasons:

Click here to view full judgment.

DEEPAK SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address