RAM ASHOK Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.

(2.) It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered under the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Prem Singh (supra) and similar relief may be given to the petitioner of the present case.

(3.) The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the fact(s) of the case to the effect that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Beldar in the year 1982 and on account of satisfactory services, he was placed in the work charge establishment on 29.06.1989. His services was subsequently regularized on 15.12.2009 in the Pay Scale i.e. Rs.5200-20,200/- and Grade Pay i.e. Rs.1800/- and got salary as well as other benefits as a regular employee. The petitioner has retired on 30.04.2018 but the pensionary benefit was not provided to him. The case of the petitioner is covered under the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court passed in the case of (Prem Singh) Supra.