SONU SHARMA Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Om Prakash, the learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Sandeep Kumar Singh for the informant and perused the record.

(2.) The instant application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in light of the apprehension of the arrest of the applicant in Case Crime No.499 of 2019, under Sections 147, 323, 307, 504, 506 IPC, police station Sector-58 NOIDA District Gautam Budh Nagar.

(3.) The instant application for grant of anticipatory bail has been preferred solely on account of addition of Section 307, 504 and 506 IPC during the course of investigation. Insofar as the first information report as it originally stood is concerned, it is fairly stated that the applicant has been granted regular bail by the concerned Court. In view of the above, it is evident that the apprehension of arrest is misplaced. The Court in this regard bears in mind the following principles as enunciated by the Supreme Court in Pradeep Ram v. State of Jharkhand [2019 SCC OnLine SC 825]:-