(1.) Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.
(2.) The instant contempt petition has been filed for violation of the injunction order granted in favour of the appellant. Applicant is the opposite party in the appeal. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the appellants therein are creating obstacle and are not permitting the applicant to sow the crops on the disputed plot.
(3.) Since disputed questions of fact are involved, which cannot be gone into in contempt jurisdiction. Applicant has remedy under Order 39 Rule 2(A) of the Code of Civil Procedure. This Court in contempt jurisdiction would decline to return finding on disputed questions of fact.