CHHIDDA Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for the State and perused the material on record.

(2.) The petitioners have filed the present writ petition challenging the order dated 26.10.2009 passed by respondent no.3 in Case No.2/13/36/2004 (Vikram Singh and others Vs. Ratiram and others), Case No.36/2009 (State Vs. Hari Singh), Case No.37/2009 (State Vs. Mangu), Case No.52/2009 (State Vs. Hari Singh), Case No.55/2009 (State Vs. Churdi) and Case No.56/2009 (State Vs. Luxman) under Section 198(4) U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act and against the order dated 29.3.2001 passed by respondent no.2 in Revision No.92/2010-11 under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act and order dated 10.9.2012 passed by respondent no.2 in Misc. Case No.45/2011-12.

(3.) The averments in brief are as under:-