HAFIZUDDIN Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION GHAZIABAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri V.K. Jaiswal for respondent No. 2 and Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad for respondent No. 3.

(2.) FOR correction of double entry in chak No. 609 and 145, Consolidation Offi cer prepared a reference and forwarded the same to the Deputy Director of Consolida tion which was registered as reference No. 1071. Exercising power conferred by sec tion 48(3) of U.P. Consolidation of Hold ings Act, the Deputy Director of Consoli dation passed an order dated 29.6.1972 ac cepting the chart forwarded by the Con solidation Officer along with his report making amendments in the chak. The said order could not be incorporated in the rec ord and thereafter, on an application moved by the petitioner under Rule 109, an order dated 13.3.1995 was passed by the Consolidation Officer directing the Tehsildar, Modinagar to carry out the amend ments as per the order passed by the Dep uty Director of Consolidation dated 26.6.1972. Still the order was not incorpo rated in the Revence record. As such, the petitioner moved another application con solidation Officer passed an order dated 16.5.2001 for incorporation of the order in the record.

(3.) IN reply, learned Counsel for the respondents have tried to justify the im pugned order.