TILAK CHAND DHIMAN Vs. STATE OF UP

JUDGEMENT

(1.) 1. The petitioner had entered into contracts with the Pashchimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd, Victoria Park, Meerut (the Corporation). The contracts were cancelled and the petitioner was black listed on 24.6.2008. The petitioner filed writ petition no. 40789 of 2008 against this order. This writ petition was decided on 12.8.2008. So far as the cancellation of contracts were concerned, the writ petition was dismissed but it was allowed so far as black listing part was concerned. The corporation was directed to serve notice and thereafter decide the question of black listing. The petitioner filed an application before the Corporation on 3.9.2008. He has again been black listed on 10.11.2008. Hence the present writ petition.

(2.) WE have heard counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel and Sri Pankaj Shukla for the respondents.

(3.) WE hereby clarify that as we have held that the order dated 10.11.2008 should be treated as notice and not the final order, the petitioner will be treated as if he is not black listed till the fresh order is passed after considering the objection of the petitioner. The order will be passed without being influenced by the order dated 10.11.2008.