SHIV SHANKAR Vs. SHASHIBALA AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Arvind Kumar Singh II, learned counsel appearing for petitioner and Sri V. K. Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for respondents.

(2.) THIS writ petition has been filed against an order dated 9.11.2009 (Annexure 5 to writ petition) by which application filed by petitioner for framing issues have been rejected.

(3.) ON the other hand, Sri Agarwal learned counsel appearing for respondents submits that application filed by petitioner for this purpose has already been rejected on 24.10.2009 and a finding to that effect has been recorded that it has to be seen whether there is relationship of landlord and tenant or not. Further petitioner by means of application 32-Gha has prayed to deposit rent and interest for which application has already been allowed.The application 28-C filed by petitioner for summoning sale deed and other documents have already been rejected on the ground that as written statment has already been filed, therefore, there is no necessity for summoning the said record and the said application was rejected on 24.10.2009.