SUDHA RANI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) 1. Perused the office report dated 18.03.2009 qua service on respondent no. 5. Office report indicates that neither acknowledgement nor un-served notice has been received back in the office as yet, as such service on said respondent is presumed to be sufficient.

(2.) PRESENT writ petition has been been field by the petitioner for quashing of the order dated 26.07.2003 passed by Deputy Inspector General of Police, U.P. Police Headquarter U.P. at Allahabad rejecting the claim of the petitioner for grant of family pension.

(3.) COUNTER affidavit has been filed and therein plea has been taken that signatures were got obtained by Smt. Hema by playing fraud upon her then pension has been released in her favour based on Government Order dated 24.08.1966.