CHOTEY LAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision against the judgment and order dated 30.7.1999 passed by Additional Sessions Judge 1st Basti in Criminal Revision No. 165 of 1997 Ram Chandra Tripathi v. State. The list has been revised. Learned Counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA are present. None is present for the complainant-opposite party No. 2.

(2.) I have heard the learned Counsel for the revisionist as well as learned AGA.

(3.) THE complainant feeling ag grieved with the above order filed Crl. Re vision No. 165 of 1997. This revision was heard and decided by Sri U.C. Tiwari, 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Basti. After hearing the revision the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Basti was of the view that there was sufficient material to summon the accused persons and the order passed by the Magistrate dismissing the complaint was erroneous. He, therefore, set aside the order of dismissal passed by the Magistrate and passed an order directing the Magis trate to summon the accused persons under sections 420, 465, 466, 468 and 471IPC. Ag grieved with that order, the accused revi sionists filed this revision.