BRAHAM DUTT TYAGI Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Shri V.K. Singh, counsel for the petitioner, Learned Standing counsel for the State respondents and Shri Nitin Sharma for the private respondents.

(2.) THIS petition is directed against the cancellation of the appointment of the petitioner dated 22.10.2005.

(3.) THE only argument urged on behalf of the petitioner is that as his services were terminated without obtaining prior approval from the U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board and therefore, in view of Section 21 of U.P. Act No. 5 of 1982, the order was void and as such ought to be quashed.