IMRAN SHAH KHAN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PETITIONER before this Court is a holder of firearm licence which is stated to have been granted in his favour by the Additional District Magistrate, Rampur vide order dated 15.5.2006 and was in respect of a Prohibited Bore D.B.B.L.-12 Bore bearing No. 101809-49. Since the licence of the petitioner was to expire in the year 2009, he made an application for renewal thereof. His application for renewal was not being considered, he, therefore, approached this Court by filing Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 13428 of 2009. The writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 6.3.2009 permitting the writ petitioner to make a representation before the District Magistrate who in turn was required to pass appropriate order on the renewal application of the licences. The District Magistrate under the impugned order has held that the licence granted in favour of the writ petition by the Additional District Magistrate was illegal and, therefore, such licence cannot be renewed. It is against this order that the present writ petition has been filed.

(2.) COUNSEL for the petitioner with reference to the definition of the District Magistrate as contained in Rule 2 (f) of the Arms Rules, 1962 submits that the District Magistrate will include the Additional District Magistrate and therefore, the order impugned in the present writ petition is based on misreading of Rule 2 (f) of the Arms Rules, 1962.

(3.) FOR the purposes of resolving the controversy it would be worthwhile to reproduce the meaning of Magistrate as contained in Section 2 (ff) of the Arms Act, 1959 which reads as follows : "Magistrate" means an Executive Magistrate under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.