(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.
(2.) THE claim of the petitioner is that he has been teaching in the institu tion from 8.10.1983 in intermediate classes but he was not being paid salary. THE Urdu subject was recognised in the intermediate classes by the Intermediate Education Board vide order dated 8.10.1983. THEreafter, the D.I.O.S. has also passed an order dated 7.12.1983 (Annexure-2 to the writ peti tion) for opening of section for Urdu language. THE petitioner has continued ever since on the said post.
(3.) IN the present case, as stated above, since the post has neither been sanctioned nor created as such no right of the petitioner accrues to receive salary from the public exchequer.