RAMMAN LAL Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A .G.A. has filed counter affidavit, whereas the applicant has filed rejoinder affidavit, which are taken on record.

(2.) HEARD Sri S.P. Srivastava, Advo­cate, appearing on behalf of the applicant and AGA for the State.

(3.) CERTAIN arguments on merit have been made by learned Counsel for the ap­plicant, but his main submission is that being devar of the deceased, the applicant was not going to be benefited by the de­mand of dowry and he has been falsely roped in this case.