NAKSU Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the revisionists and the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

(2.) THE revisionists Naksu and others have preferred this revision against the order dated 19.8.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2, Badaun in Special Session Trial No. 119 of 2000 whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge has summoned the revisionists under Section 319, Cr. P.C. to face trial in regard to the offences triable under Sections 147, 148, 326/149, 307/149 and Section 3 (2) (v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

(3.) IN my opinion the revision has no substance in view of the fact that P.W. 1 Ram Pal and P.W. 2 Ram Chandra have supported the prosecution story so far as the involvement of the revisionists is concerned.