HEMLATA TRIPATHI Vs. PREM KUMARI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the parties. The present revision has been filed by the tenant.

(2.) THE facts arising out of the present revision are that the opposite par ties filed a suit for arrears of rent, ejectment and damages against the applicant with the allegations that she has sublet the premises in dispute and has also committed default in payment of rent. A written statement was filed by the applicant denying the subletting and has submitted that the entire rent has been deposited under section 20 (4) of the Act. THE prescribed authority after consideration of the pleadings of the parties has decreed the suit after holding that Act No. XIII of 1972 is not applicable. A revision was filed by the appli cant and that too has been dismissed. Hence, the present revision.

(3.) THE revision is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed.