(1.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the left out parties.
(2.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel.
(3.) I have perused the record of Writ Petition No. 27586 of 2008. Though chal lenge in the said petition has been made to the order against which the petitioners moved recall application, but since there is no interim order staying the proceedings, mere pendency of the writ petition cannot stand in the way of the Deputy Director of Consolidation to decide the recall applica tion. Furthermore, when the petition was presented on 6.6.2008, on the request made by the learned Counsel for the peti tioner, it was directed to be put up on 1.7.2008 as fresh. On 16.7.2008, the case was again taken up but since no one appeared, it was directed to be listed in ordinary course.