RAM CHANDRA YADAV Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A .G.A. has filed counter -affidavit, whereas applicant's Counsel has filed supplementary -affidavit, which are taken on record.

(2.) HEARD Sri V.P. Srivastava, learned senior Counsel, assisted by Sri Sandeep Kumar Rai, advocate, appearing for the applicant and A.G.A. for the State.

(3.) THE first and foremost submission made by learned Counsel for the applicant is that the complainant Shambhu Yadav has been examined in trial Court in S.T. No. 57 of 2008, but he has not supported the case of prosecution and turned hostile. For this submission, my attention has been drawn towards statement of the complainant Shambhu Yadav, copy whereof has been filed as Annexure -S.A. 1 with supplementary -affidavit dated 13.7.2009, in which he has stated that the accused persons were not making any demand of dowry from her grand -daughter Savita and she was not being harassed by the accused persons.