RADHA KISHAN AGARWAL Vs. PARSADI DHOBHI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1 Shri Arvind Srivastava.

(2.) ALTHOUGH vakalatnama has been filed by the respondents No. 2 and 3, no Counsel has appeared for them. They had been granted time by this Court earlier to file a counter-affidavit but they have chosen not to do so.

(3.) THE disputed premises is a shop bearing No. 27/61 Thela Char Pathwari, Belanganj, Agra. The respondent No. 1 was the tenant of the shop in dispute at Rs. 3/- per month. The respondent No. 1 contested the case. The pre scribed authority by its judgment dated 19.7.2003 allowed the release applica tion of the landlord holding that the need of the petitioner landlord was bona fide and his comparative need was greater.