KALI SHANKER GUPTA Vs. MANIK CHANDRA TIWARI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Atul Dayal, counsel for petitioner and Smt. Anita Srivastava, counsel for contesting respondent.

(2.) COUNTER and rejoinder affidavits, supplementary affidavit and supplementary counter affidavit as well as supplementary rejoinder affidavit have been exchanged. As agreed between parties, the instant writ petition is finally decided at the stage of admission itself.

(3.) THE entire premises bearing municipal no.123/516 (old), 123/931 (new), Fazalganj, Kanpur Nagar, consists of a number of small portions in occupation of different tenants. This premises was purchased by present landlord on 12.2.1990. Petitioner was paying rent at the rate of Rs.30/- per month. Proceedings before Rent Control and Eviction Officer commenced on an application given by landlord-respondent under Section 15(1) of U.P. Act No.XIII of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in the year 2001 intimating vacancy. Proceedings commenced on the basis of aforesaid application. Rent Control Inspector submitted his report after inspection in accordance with law on 27.6.2001.