DULAI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUPPLEMENTARY affidavit filed by the petitioners is admitted to record.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners has vehemently contended that denial of benefit of regularization for which the petitioners are legally entitled, are highly arbitrary, unjustified and causing great injustice to the petitioners. Further, he submits that the petitioners have rendered several long years of service. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have rendered several long years of service but they have not yet been been regularised, whereas persons junior to them have been regularised.