STATE OF U P Vs. SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel in support of this appeal. Mr. Rahul Sripat appears for the respondent.

(2.) THE appellant-State seeks to challenge the order passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent herein by an order dated 9.11.2005. THE respondent had sought employment on compassionate ground on the footing that his father was in a regular employment of the State.

(3.) IT is submitted by Dr. Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel that the respondent's father was not in a regular employment and therefore, could not get any benefit of the rule providing employment to a person under dying in harness scheme.