SHASHI KALA PATEL Vs. SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE FATEHPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CONSIDERING the urgency in the matter as the recounting of votes has been ordered to be conducted today, which is by the impugned order dated 23.3.2009 passed by the respondent No. 1, the Sub- Divisional Magistrate, this case has been taken up on board today in the presence of the learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1, 6 and 7 and Sri Vishal Tandon for the contesting respondent No. 2, Smt. Sobha Devi. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of finally at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

(3.) FROM perusal of the record, it is clear that the ten issues have been framed and the same have been decided in one paragraph in the end without considering the evidence adduced by the parties and without deciding each issue individually.-All that has been stated in the impugned order is that all the issues are decided accordingly.