KESHAV SINGH BHADAURIYA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) 1. Heard Sri Rajendra Prasad Shukla learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashok Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel for the opposite parties.

(2.) THE petitioner being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 19.02.1996 passed by the State Public Services Tribunal by which the claim petition preferred by the petitioner, against the dismissal order dated 07.02.1991 and the appellate order dated 14/16.12.1991 was dismissed and the order dated 30.04.1997 by which the review petition preferred by the petitioner was dismissed by the State Public Services Tribunal has filed the instant writ petition.

(3.) THE learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties submits that there is no illegality in the impugned judgment and order dated 19.02.1996 passed by the State Public Services Tribunal. He further submits that the order of dismissal was passed after holding enquiry into the matter and the appeal preferred by the petitioner was also dismissed by the appellate authority. He further submits that a second show cause notice dated 04.12.1990 was issued by the Superintendent of Police, Badaun to the petitioner to show cause why he should not be dismissed from service. He further submits that the petitioner was a member of the disciplined force and the misconduct in such cases is to be dealt with by iron hands. THE learned Standing counsel has relied upon the decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Ramesh Chandra Sharma v. Punjab National Bank and another reported in (2007) 9 SCC 15.