RAJ KUMAR DUBEY Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WE have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA.

(2.) LEARNED AGA submits that no useful purpose would be served in calling for a counter affidavit and keeping the matter pending in the High Court and the petition may be disposed of at this stage itself.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner drew our attention to two Full Bench decisions in Ramji Pandey v. State of U.P. and others, 1981 Cri LJ 1083 and Bhim Sen Tyagi v. State of U.P. through D.M. Mahamaya Nagar, 1999 (2) JIG 192 (All) (FB).