RAVINDRA NATH KUSHWAHA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the State-respondents.

(2.) PETITIONER before this Court claims to have been appointed on ad hoc basis against a vacancy caused in L.T. grade on account of retirement of one Harish Chandra Srivastava on 30th June, 1991. According to the petitioner an advertisement was published by the Committee of Management of the Institution, D.A.V. Intermediate College, Meerapur, Allahabad for ad hoc appointment against said vacancy. The petitioner, who was possessed of the prescribed qualification applied in response thereto. He was placed at serial No. 1 in the merit list prepared by Selection Committee. The Management of the institution passed a resolution dated 15th March, 1992 offering ad hoc appointment to the petitioner. The petitioner was infact issued an appointment letter by the Management on 17th March, 1992. Papers qua appointment of the petitioner were forwarded to the District Inspector of Schools, Allahabad for grant of financial approval. The District Inspector of Schools vide order dated 1st June, 1992 refused to accord financial approval to the appointment of the petitioner and directed as follows : ...[VERNACULAR TEXT OMMITED]...

(3.) PETITIONER has now approached this Court by this petition for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization in view of Section 33C of the U. P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 1982').