BABU CHAND Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY means of this petition the petitioners have prayed for writ of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 25.8.1981, 11.5.2006 and 29.9.2006 passed by the respondents and have further prayed that respondents be restrained from dispossession the petition ers from the land in dispute.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in ac tual physical possession of the plot in question and the respondent have not taken actual physical possession of the plot in question.

(3.) POSSESSION on paper is a symbolic possession and word 'possession' used in Clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the Act mean actual physical possession and not the symbolic possession.