SUNIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the revisionist, learned AGA and perused the record.

(2.) THIS criminal revision has been filed with a prayer to quash the orders dated 23-5-2008, 16-4-2008 and 22-1-2008 and allow the present criminal revision.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the revisionist contended that since in two different certificates different date of births were mentioned, hence Principal Judge Juvenile Justice Board, Lalitpur has committed error in rejecting the application of revisionist because if date of birth mentioned in the school certificate was doubtful and same has to be decided on the basis of medical report.