TEJ SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) 1. We have heard counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel for the respondents.

(2.) THE land of the petitioner/petitioner's predecessor was declared as surplus land under the Urban Ceiling Act. This Act has been repealed. According to the petitioner, he is still in actual possession over the land declared as surplus land and as such possession can not be taken from him. He further submits that even if possession is taken from him on paper, it should be restored to him as no compensation has been paid to him and in any case he is willing to refund the amount.

(3.) WITH these directions the writ petition is disposed of.