REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

TAHSILDAR SINGH (CONSTABLE 289 CP) Appellant

V/S

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Fifteen petitioners working as Constable posted in District Etah have been transferred by means of the impugned orders dated 18.9.2009, 20.9.2009 and 22.9.2009, copy whereof has been filed collectively as Annexure-3 to the writ petition. The aforesaid orders of transfer have been passed in public interest by the Superintendent of Police (Establishment), acting on behalf of Deputy Inspector General of Police (Establishment), U.P. Police Head Quarters, Allahabad. It is also evident from the impugned orders that the same have been issued after concurrence of the Police Establishment Board which has been obtained in view of the Apex Court decision in Prakash Singh and others v. Union of India and others, (2006) 8 SCC 1. It is clearly averred in para 5 of the writ petition that the petitioners are posted in District Etah for the last more than ten years.

(2.) Sri Nisheeth Yadav, Advocate has assailed the impugned orders of transfer contending :

(3.) Though, learned counsel for the petitioners has canvassed all the above points at length arguing the matter with great labour, diligence and ability, but having given my anxious and deepest thought to the matter, I find myself unable to accept any of the above submission. In my view, this writ petition does not call for any interference.

Click here to view full judgment.

TAHSILDAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address