RENU ALIAS RAJNEE Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents.

(2.) NO notice is being issued to the private respondent in view of the order proposed to be passed today. Liberty is reserved for the private respondent to seek modification of the order passed herein below, if so advised.

(3.) MARRIAGE is definitely wishes of a boy and girl to continue with their conjugal relationship provided they have attained the age of marriage, as required by law. We have been fortified with several writ petitions in which more or less identical reliefs are claimed for protection of their marital relationship, which is allegedly being interfered with and harassed by their parents or relatives, who are private respondents. The writ jurisdiction is not made to resolve such type of dispute between the two private parties. We otherwise strongly believe family law is no law. It is a social problem, which can only be uprooted socially and not by the intervention of the writ Court in the garb of violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India unless it is established beyond doubt.