BRAHMA SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) THE question involved in this writ petition is as to whether services of petitioner rendered before 1.4.1996 can be counted for the purposes of pension or not?

(3.) IN the impugned order, it is mentioned that manger stated that he had not received any order or direction regarding deposit of P.P. contribution of the management. It is also mentioned in the said order that the entire provident fund (P.P.), which had been deposited by the petitioner after 1.4.1996 since when school was brought on grant-in-aid list, along with interest had been re funded to the petitioner. Representation was rejected on the ground that until 31.3.2002 the last cut off date, contribution of management of provident fund in respect of petitioner was not deposited.