VINOD KUMAR SHUKLA Vs. JAL MANDAL LTD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for petitioner.

(2.) GRIEVANCE of petitioner is that an amendment application dated 25.3.2008 vide paper No. 73-Ka under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. in S.C.C. Suit No. 12 of 2004 instituted at the instance of landlord, has been rejected by Additional District Judge, court No. 2, Varanasi vide order dated 9.7.2009.

(3.) I have perused the impugned order. While rejecting amendment application, main consideration weighing in the mind of Additional District Judge was that whatever tenant wants to bring by means of additional written statement, has already said in written statement itself, therefore, it does not require any amendment.